Sumit Nagal vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nagal vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Sumit Nagal vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 0 - 0 Evans
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 54.5% of points on their second serve, while Evans has won 50.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 54.77% of their opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 49.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.39% and 25.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 62.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 63.16% of matches played (W/L 48/ 28), with Evans winning 37.21% (W/L 16/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 223/ 128), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 47/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.81% of matches (W/L 37/ 16), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 27.78% of matches (W/L 5/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.12 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 171.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 45.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 29.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
77
Rank
77
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
62
Rank
21
High
34
Age
R
Plays
Form
61% (326-208)
Career Total W/L
60% (555-376)
66% (27-14)
YTD W/L
33% (8-16)
$434,190
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
![banner](https://matchstat.com/assets/images/matchstat-banner.webp)
The Best Odds For Sumit Nagal vs Daniel Evans For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nagal VS Evans
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Sumit Nagal | Daniel Evans |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 66% (27/14) | 33% (8/16) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (62/37) | 40% (25/37) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (506/434) | 47% (293/332) |
Hard Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 30% (3/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 68% (13/6) | 22% (2/7) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Aces pg | 0.14 | 0.34 |
Aces Total | 66 | 104 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0.27 |
DFs Total | 56 | 84 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:10 | 2:12:6 |
Avg Opp Rank | 221.56 | 203.13 |
1st Serve % | 71% (2154/3031) | 57% (1131/1992) |
1st Serve W% | 66% (1421/2154) | 72% (818/1131) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (478/877) | 51% (438/861) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (136/296) | 30% (46/154) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (1220/3006) | 35% (699/2011) |
Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Masters W/L | 50% (4/4) | 20% (1/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 25% (1/3) | 22% (2/7) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 78% (18/5) | 63% (5/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (26/38) | 36% (8/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 62% (8/13) | 29% (4/14) |
Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 27% (3/11) |
1st set W, W | 83% (29/24) | 58% (12/7) |
1st set W, L | 17% (29/5) | 42% (12/5) |
1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 8% (12/1) |
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
80%
(
78 of
98)
1st Serve %
75%
(
63 of
84)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Maks Kasnikowski
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alexander Ritschard
72%
(
77 of
107)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Luca Van Assche
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ivan Gakhov
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nikoloz Basilashvili
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Henry Searle
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Dominic Stricker
53%
(
52 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Zachary Svajda
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Adam Walton
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
12
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
1
93%
(
53 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
58 of
76)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
33 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Holger Rune
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
49%
(
49 of
101)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
105
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Daniel Evans
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
53%
(
60 of
114)
20
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Juncheng Shang
Player
Daniel Evans
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Harold Mayot
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Evans
Player
Hugo Grenier
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Nagal Vs Evans Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nagal are available here and Evans photos here.
![Nagal Evans H2h Summary Stats 17th June 2024 Nagal Evans H2h Summary Stats 17th June 2024](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-Evans-Sumit-Nagal-h2h-profile.webp)
![Sumit Nagal Daniel Evans Prediction Stats Sumit Nagal Daniel Evans Prediction Stats](https://matchstat.com/captures/ms/atp/Daniel-Evans-Sumit-Nagal-h2h-stats.webp)